Don’t confuse with accumulation point (of sequences).

Motivation

A limit point of is a point you can approach from within . That is the precondition for function limits: makes sense only when is a limit point of the domain, otherwise no points of get near and there is nothing to take a limit of. So they mark where continuity and limits can be asked about.

Limit point of a set

Let . A point is a limit point of if every punctured epsilon neighbourhood of (the ball with removed) contains a point of :

Equivalently: some sequence in has .

Removing forces the nearby points to be other members of : cannot count as its own witness, so it need not lie in at all.

The opposite is an isolated point: a point of with a neighbourhood holding no other point of . Every point of is one or the other.

The points of on the line. They pile up toward : the gap between consecutive points shrinks to zero, so any ball , however small, still contains every with , i.e. infinitely many. So is a limit point, though (open circle).
A single point has room around it instead: the neighbours of , namely and , sit a fixed distance away, so a small enough holds only . Every is isolated this way.

Limit points of common sets

: the only limit point is , and . Each is isolated.
: limit points are all of , including the endpoints that aren’t in the set. No point of the interval is isolated.
: every is a limit point, since the rationals are dense. Uncountably many limit points out of a countable set.
Any finite set: no limit points (always a gap to fit a ball into).
: no limit point in , every point is isolated. It accumulates only at , which is why the definition is sometimes extended to .

A bounded infinite subset of always has a limit point (set form of Bolzano-Weierstrass).