Root test

Let be a series.
i) if there exists some such that

then is absolutely convergent.
ii) Conversely, if

then is divergent.

Proof:
… by comparison test with a geometric series.

Assume there is some s.t. for .

First split the sum, then, for , we have :

is finite, is also finite, for , so is finite, which means is absolutely convergent.


Equivalenty, via limsup, the root test says:

i) absolutely convergent
ii) divergent
iii) inconclusive

Note: says nothing about the terms failing to vanish (that’d be the case if you remove the root). The root goes to for any fixed , as .
… terms vanish faster than every geometric sequence, e.g. (root: )
… terms vanish like (geometric decay)
… terms decay subexponentially (slower than every geometric sequence) or not at all
… terms grow geometrically along an infinite subsequence

EXAMPLE

Take : that means , i.e. . Infinitely many positive terms, yes, but a sum of infinitely many positive terms is finite whenever they shrink fast enough, as the geometric series shows.

The root test only detects exponential decay.

diverges.
converges.

It asks “do the terms behave like for some ?” Polynomial decay like for some converges for some , but since independent of , the root test sees both as “no exponential decay” () and can’t tell them apart.