Sandwich rule
The condition can be relaxed to for all (finitely many exceptions don’t matter).
Proof
Let . Since and , there exists such that for all :
So for (because is equivalent to ; ” is within distance of ”).
for
Assume (so we want to show the limit is ).
Lower bound: , so .
(Note: is just algebra: . No limit involved.)Upper bound: Since , we have , so .
Thus .As , , so the upper bound .
By sandwich: .
The larger base dominates exponentially.
Sequence without closed-form terms
Consider . There’s no simple pattern or closed form for , so we can’t compute the limit directly.
But we can bound it: .
Therefore:
Both and converge to , so by sandwich.