The below definitions hold for any partial order e.g. also .
Bounded sets
Let
is bounded from above iffis an upper bound for .
is bounded from below iffis a lower bound for .
We say that is bounded iff it is bounded from above and from below.
Infimum
The infimum (greatest lower bound) of a set that is bounded from below is the largest real number such that is a lower bound for :
Denoted by .
If a set is not bounded from below, we define . For the empty set, we define .
Supremum
The supremum (least upper bound) of a set that is bounded from above is the smallest real number such that is an upper bound for :
Denoted by .
If a set is not bounded from above, we define . For the empty set, we define .
What's the difference between minimum / maximum and infimum / supremum?
and
However,
, , , do not exist, because there is no second smallest / largest element
For any candidate for , you can always find something smaller like , which is between and and still in the interval.
That’s exactly why the concept of infimum / supremum are useful. It’s what the elements approach but not never reach.
Does have an inf/sup/min/max?
Supremum/maximuim:
Infimum:
Minimum: does not exist, because zero is never reached.
Does have an inf/sup/min/max?
Completeness axiom of the real numbers
Every non-empty subset that is bounded from above has a supremum in , i.e. such that (similarily for infimum).
Not every subset of has a supremum in
For example: The set is bounded, i.e. .
So , and similarily , so they do not exist in .
→ Infimum and Supremum are always defined in a certain space.
We can approach abritrarly closely with rational numbers, but never reach it.
But, we can define in , because .
Note
In : bounded → has minimum and maximum (because of discreteness)
In : bounded → may not have /
In : bounded → always has / (completeness axiom)
Link to originalA field with a partial order is complete if every that is bounded from above has
The field of real numbers is a complete field with linear order.
In fact, it is the unique complete field with linear order (up to isomorphism).
is not a complete field, as e.g. has no supremum in .
Rational numbers are dense in the reals.
a)
Transclude of archimedian-property#^814f46
b)c)
→ If I pick two real numbers, there is always a rational number in between them.